 |
|
Nov 13, 2005, 01:25 AM // 01:25
|
#21 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
It's not a fundamental problem with balancing...it's a fundamental problem with the common PvE player. All they want is the most simplistic way to make themselves feel "uber". This game was marketed, and designed as a game that required tactics and skill to complete. As far as I'm concerned ArenaNET failed to deliver....it takes little more than your pre-searing skills and the ability to smash buttons to complete the PvE campaign. It's painfully apparent that this is the case when you spend a hours upon hours at Thunderhead attempting to get a group together competent enough to complete what is in reality a very very simple task. However, GW's failure to force you to play your profession correctly coupled with the fact that most people are perfectly content downloading builds off the internet and never fully understanding why they work, produces what we call a "noob trap". Now instead of thanking ArenaNet for striving to make the game more difficult(and eliminating "noob traps") the PvE masses gather at forums to bitch and moan about how the build they downloaded from the internet no longer works....it's really quite pathetic. ArenaNet is making an attempt to force you to play the game with skill and thought....I guess the majority of gamers aren't ready for that yet.
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 01:27 AM // 01:27
|
#22 | |
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 01:34 AM // 01:34
|
#23 | |
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Guild: Servants of Fortuna [SoF]
Profession: Mo/
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 01:53 AM // 01:53
|
#24 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
(Everything below in " " is GWguru, or something like that from above.) "All they want is the most simplistic way to make themselves feel "uber"" I would consider myself an average PvE'er. I just want to play the game without having it totally change under my feet with a tiny patch. That is what expansions are for. I don't farm, hell, i'm only level 13 and I get a huge kick out of dying. I got myself ran to ToA, some stranger oddly volunteered to pay for my broke ass Ele/Mes from Lions arch. I would rather go out there and get my but whooped than kill scorpions easily around ascalon all day. Anyways, I don't farm, I don't want to feel uber, I'm carrying a wand that does 4-6 damage for pete's sake(only cause i have an offhand that does better +'s than any 2handerI've found) I don't buy much from other people, I'm earning my own way about 98% as far as XP and items go, me an henchies in bigger badder places. "GW's failure to force you to play your profession correctly" The way the designed the game, there is no incorrect way to play. "New heroes can be deleted and created at any time, allowing you to create specialized characters or to have fun experimenting with profession combinations, skills, and attributes until you create the hero that suits you best." Sure maybe someone can make a better build, or play with one that's not so good, but it's either lack of IQ, or personal choice. There is no bonus or special "leet" prize for those that get the best combos/builds. "ArenaNet is making an attempt to force you to play the game with skill and thought...." Is that what their patch announcement states? The patches intent was to hamper farmers, period. It is apparent the elementalists were not overpowered, otherwise complaints of their power would have already reached the nerf point long ago. Suppose you're right(which you're not): "ArenaNet is making an attempt to force you to play the game with skill and thought....I guess the majority of gamers aren't ready for that yet.[/" No, most people aren't ready to buy a game because it advertises choices, then have the game maker go nazi and say, you have to play it this certain way. What kind of drugs are you on? That was so obviously not the intent of GW. If they wanted simply to add difficulty, they could have simply raised the HP level of everything, or armor, or resistances. There are so many people that back this patch 100%, love it, and yet, they're on the forums, not playing the game they think is great. There was virtually no complaint of how the AI was before. I think they all are playing devils advocate just to get people's goat, for some inner need to prove themselves. I'm sick of people who are acting as if they were asking for this patch for months. Last edited by Aeon_Xin; Nov 13, 2005 at 02:05 AM // 02:05.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:03 AM // 02:03
|
#25 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
yes....because adding level 900 monsters that continue to stand in 14 Fire Storms in a row is adding difficulty. That's not difficulty that's grind...mobs SHOULD move out of AoE damage. It's the most basic natural instinct to move AWAY from something causing pain...even animals have this instinct. It was completely rediculous that entire mobs would stand in a Fire Storm and get obliterated while you feverishly click Fire Storm repeatadly waiting for it to recharge...that's not skill it's monotony. This patch has gotten me to play PvE for the first time in months and ya know...it's actually somewhat entertaining. Unlike the grind to unlock skills/runes it used to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:08 AM // 02:08
|
#26 | ||||||||||
|
Just Plain Fluffy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Guild: Idiot Savants
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I caught, exploited, reported, and ultimately helped get the Arid Sea chests fixed. That happened early on before most players even heard about the area. Can you imagine what would happen if they made that change now? This forum would be filled with hundred page posts by people bitching about the change to 'their farming spot', just as we've seen when the original change to chests was made, or when Protective Bond was brought back in line, or whenever any imbalance or bug is fixed that affects people's ability to mindlessly farm for gold. PvP balance changes are embraced - PvE balance changes are fought with petitions. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I mean can people even believe themselves? I'm reading these petitions and people are threatening to quit the game forever because monsters don't stand in Firestorm. Is that what gaming is about to you? Quote:
Peace, -CxE
__________________
Don't argue with idiots. They bring you to their level and beat you with experience. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:17 AM // 02:17
|
#27 | |
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Guild: The War Masters
Profession: R/W
|
Quote:
I don't understand why people do not appreciate Anet for having the same concern for balance when it comes to PvE. A game in which a few professions with specific spells and skills are really good for half of the game (the pve part), such as AOE-fire-nukers, invincy-monks etc. is imbalanced. If there are only a few 'optimal builds', people will be playing these all the time, making the game boring. Of course, some people care more about hoarding money or items or getting fissure armour than overall game balance. Which is their right, as players. Anet should not. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:34 AM // 02:34
|
#28 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
The words feral, wild, inhuman, brutal, insane, cold-blooded, and bestial all apply to some or all adversaries for any player in the RPG part of the game. Most of those definitions are pretty blunt, and some even state, with no thought to consequences and lacking intelligence or reason. Any starving wild animalwill put itself in grave danger at a chance to get a mouthful of flesh. A monster helbent on killing you just might be willing to stand in your firestorm if it means tasting squishy flesh. Most wild animals(on the planet earth, present day), even those that have rabies will not attack every human it sees while not touching other animals around it. The way animals react on earth is a moot point, this game is not simulating rats, or even bears and tigers. Animals, real ones, kill to eat, and only get agressive to non meals when they feel threatened. If something non meal runs away, the animals usually let it. It's a damn fantasy world with godamn made up magic and monsters. You want realism, there would be a shit tone less fighting, go elsewhere. If you think this whole game is based on realism, take off your tinfoil "platemail" leave your parents basement, and get a job. Leave the knives daggers and swords at home too. Realism, is not a bunch of creatures that cast spells at you or want to cut your tongue out and use it as jewelry. Question, any normal human(this is role reversal here), that is being attacked, that would suddenly have fire fall on his head, well, personally, If I knew what I was fighting wanted to kill me, my friends, family, wife, and kids, well, yes, I'd stand in that fire in hopes I could get that one valued throat slash in. Cause why? If the bastard can rain fire on me, I'm probably doomed anyways. Still got questions? Now about the actual AI. Alot of one hit attacks that can do 100+ will not scare monsters off, but my current firestorm that does average about 14damage a tick will make him run away to find a target. Before the patch my firestorm would not even take an 10th of some monsters I've fought in the full 10 seconds. Now they get out of the bastard, cause it scares them more than anything, sure doesn't hurt them with any effect now now. Or say, I died, hey, it happens, the 2fighter henchies are whailing on a monster, doing WAY more damage than my 14 a second for 3-4 seconds at most. He's got no problem standing there. If he's going to run from my few seconds worth of 14 damage, he should run from any other strike doing the same amount of damage or more. Sure, bring on the arguments about how the AI is so much smarter now, so much more "realistic". *edit, IT's the idea as a whole as I'm talking about, don't be taking things out of context, that's for cheesy politicians. Last edited by Aeon_Xin; Nov 13, 2005 at 02:43 AM // 02:43.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:37 AM // 02:37
|
#29 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East Texas
|
I see now why I only post in the OT sections. LOL.
I can see both sides of the balance issue though, but I am confused as to when the issue became so devisive. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:48 AM // 02:48
|
#30 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
It got that why when people say that it's whining, or that you're just too stupid to think around it. The point of the update was to hinder those that farm(*edit, farm, probably for the ebay farmers, not the farmers trying to trade ingame, though that is speculation), not to make it more challenging, or to nerf skills. If their intention was to nerf fire AOE's, they would have edited the skills down. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 02:48 AM // 02:48
|
#31 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
Animals DO NOT attack when they feel threatened...animals attack when they feel threatened AND can't find a reasonable escape OR feel as though they have the upper hand. Sorry to say...stepping 10 feet to the side and removing yourself from AoE damage is HELPING you in battle..any creature(whether fictional or real) SHOULD and most definately WOULD possess the innate instincts to do this(hence the reason it survived and wasn't completely whiped out with the rest of the creatures that don't possess this instinct)....and if your opinion weren't clouded by the fact that you're sole interest here is to make your Elementalist "uber" again you'd probably realize this. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 03:03 AM // 03:03
|
#32 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
I'm freaking a lvl 13, I'm not uber, and I never will be, and I never want to be. You're only reapeating, "it's dumb to stand there" in glorified words. But you did prove my point further, this game is obviously not the real world, if animals only attack if they have the upper hand, have no means of escape, and all that. Anything that sees me, aside from the few monsters that don't aggro period will attack, weather they have a chance of surviving or not. That alone would show that the creature might not step out of my pidly firestorm that does 14 each second. The trigger added is just a really sad imitation at reason. It's a simple trigger that is sometimes insanely stupid. A bone dragon(i think that's what they're called) should hardly blink if I use firestorm on him. But no, even If I took all points out of fire, firestorm is doing so little damage as to be laughable, the biggest monsters in the game will still run away from it, maybe turn to fight me, maybe a different target all together. Now, if I get a creature down to a tenth of his life(or whatever level, 25%), I would have no problem with him trying to run away or switching targets. You cry, it's realism. It's freaking not, and you can't argue the point. You'd do better trying to get everyone to believe that clouds are black if you look at the earth from space. *Edit* Furthermore, a magically created creature is not likely created with self preservation in mind. Take some elemental. All they do is wander around till you show up. they don't eat, they don't find shelter. Most monsters, in any sci fi or fantasy world, are basically creations programmed to kill. They are minions, basically, from some things as high up as gods. They are programmed to kill. So, in almost most past fantasy writings, the former AI of these monsters is held more true to the storyline in how they were created. Programmer(or evil god) HHmm, if I make a hundred of these creatures, with claws and big teeth, well, i'm going to make them as ferocious as possible. I'm not going to program them with anything else, why should I? Most any evil power in any story, thinks it's invincible and this gets passed on to it's minions, and that is it's weakness. I wil concede a point. Sometimes in a fight, such a simple thing as a sidestep is purely instinctual. If that were the case, everything in the game should randomly sidestep any given attack. To work it into a realistic code for games like this would be immensely ridiculous. You're talking full out, tactical fighting down to foot placement and stance, you're not going to get anything like that outside of a virtual 3d full scale room. On this medium, and this type of game(RPG), any attempt at simulation of real world circumstances would be futile and impossible to control. If you want to push realism, make fighting in water slower, movement and everything. when people fall down on hillsides, have them roll down the hill. There are a plethora of things like that that NEED to be added to a game to make it realistic. This game is so far away from any sort of realism, it's stuck where it's at, and adding overly simplistic triggers only makes it worse(IE the patch where the monsters sprinted away). Utterly futile to argue that it's realism. Argue me if you will, you know you're wrong, and so does anyone else reading these posts. Last edited by Aeon_Xin; Nov 13, 2005 at 03:31 AM // 03:31.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 03:25 AM // 03:25
|
#33 | |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Guild: Trance of Asgard
Profession: E/Mo
|
Quote:
 Your logic loses. /unsigned Oh, and don't forget the Charr. The crazy, feral, bestial race that happens to know how to work advanced magic, and has shown no sign of eating humans. Should they stand in the firey-pain circle too? Last edited by Eltargrim; Nov 13, 2005 at 03:30 AM // 03:30.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 03:27 AM // 03:27
|
#34 | |
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: May 2005
|
Quote:
But seriously, I kid..well not really. No really, I'm kinda glad they make things more of a challenge....seems sorta opposite of a trend I've noticed in alot of games. So I guess I agree and if I was cool I'd do a '/not signed' to the OP, but since I'm not I won't. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 03:43 AM // 03:43
|
#35 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
Simply one example, taken completely out of context. Oh, didn't you read that part? The whole post was not about eating humans, but offering several explanations, that could span acrost every race of monster, of why they would not have a sense of self preservation. Just because everyone has this ideal of selfish, and not selflessness programmed into them, you call can't imagine it. Lets me and you fight. You can have a buddy poor flaming coals on me. I'll suffer through it, guarantee you. You'll be totally missing vital parts of your anatomy, and I'll have burn scars, big woop.(That's sarcasm, kinda, in no way a threat, just an example) /retarted You lose for not having reading comprehension skills. Last edited by Aeon_Xin; Nov 13, 2005 at 03:48 AM // 03:48.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 03:53 AM // 03:53
|
#36 |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Guild: Trance of Asgard
Profession: E/Mo
|
Wow, way to call me retarded and be offensive to everyone who has a mental disability, simply for not having time to do more than skim.
/You lose, for using mental disabilities for insults Now, let's see; currently, the combat system can't deal with specific-damage point flee triggers. So they put in a conditional trigger; If taking damage from an AoE effect, move. It's a simple, effective way to stop AoE nuking from being the end-all approach to kill monsters. You are the one saying that making it realistic is impossible to control; this isn't realistic, per se. It's a change to encourage other elementalist styles of play, not a change to make the game more realistic. How ironic, that you're the one crying about the change because it isn't realistic. |
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 04:04 AM // 04:04
|
#37 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
I'm not crying, I'm actually laughing at you, but not to the point of tears yet. The change wasn't to put elementalists in line, or they would have edited the skills that were overpowered, as is the trend for such fairness patches. The change was to put an end to the biggest farmers, elementalists. You missed alot. I'm not saying it isn't realistic now. Someone said that it was not realistic before the patch, and I listed several reasons that it was reaslistic before the patch. I then went into detail about realism in a pc video game, and about how little can be achieved, and how pathetic it really is. I do not support the change, I am opposed to it, because there is no reason I should buy the game, to have it change this drastically under my feet. If you're going to reply to people, you should really know what's going on. You remind me of Donnie(sp?) from the Big Lebowski. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 04:11 AM // 04:11
|
#38 | |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Profession: W/Mo
|
Quote:
The idea behind the patch is a sound one but it stops there. The AI didn't become "Smarter". Test it yourself, Take any Class with a Monk secondary to any battle area. Use a Non AoE Skill with points at MAX and see if they RUN. Now cast Symbol of Wrath in a Mob with 0 Points in the Smiting and see what happens... Then talk about "Intelligent" AI |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 04:17 AM // 04:17
|
#39 | ||||||
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Nov 13, 2005, 04:54 AM // 04:54
|
#40 | ||||
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
Quote:
Obviously none of these creatures are just natural evolutions, magic had an influence, maybe it just mutated, whatever the case, they got twisted in some form or another. I'm using story, well established pseudo mythology from many works of fiction to illustrate my point. If you don't understand that, I say dragon, you think big lizard with wings, blows fire(or the oriental version). Well there's a common concept about vampire, they drink blood. None of this is real, but it's commonly accepted that's the way these creatures would be if they existed. "Furthermore, a magically created creature is not likely created with self preservation in mind. Take some elemental. All they do is wander around till you show up. they don't eat, they don't find shelter. Most monsters, in any sci fi or fantasy world, are basically creations programmed to kill. They are minions, basically, from some things as high up as gods. They are programmed to kill. So, in almost most past fantasy writings, the former AI of these monsters is held more true to the storyline in how they were created. Programmer(or evil god) HHmm, if I make a hundred of these creatures, with claws and big teeth, well, i'm going to make them as ferocious as possible. I'm not going to program them with anything else, why should I? Most any evil power in any story, thinks it's invincible and this gets passed on to it's minions, and that is it's weakness." Overconfidence, insane killer, whatever the case may be, it's different than a bear crappin' in the woods. Quote:
Quote:
I did not mention tar or Ice. What I mentioned were just examples of all kinds of realism, more than I could list, could be theretically added, if that were the purpose of the game. And you tell me I need to get further... Read the whole argument of realism vs video game in the past several posts, come back when you can keep atleast a whole idea in your head. If you're going to run away from water during a life or death fight, you may want to avoid fighting at all costs. "Well for one thing, I highly doubt a bone dragon can blink. Another thing, I don't know many people that wait until a problem is almost killing them before they try to fix it. It doesn't make too much sense to me." OK, relate that to your life and death fight invovling presurized water, but it's now a fake supersoaker. You: "If I was in a fight to the death and my opponent had set up something that was shooting pressurized water at me, I would dodge it. It obviously can't injure me, but it sure as hell is annoying. I would imagine its fairly similar with magical fire from the sky :P" Me: "Lets me and you fight. You can have a buddy poor flaming coals on me. I'll suffer through it, guarantee you. You'll be totally missing vital parts of your anatomy, and I'll have burn scars, big woop.(That's sarcasm, kinda, in no way a threat, just an example)" Most people in a struggle, life or death, won't care about, or even notice,annoying. And that's people, imagine some unrealistic creature, wanting to devour your soul or something. What's a little watter, or some hot coals bouncing offa me? If you were fighting on gravel or pavement, would you try to move the fight on over to the nice soft non abrasive grass? I'm not saying every creature will stand that and take the damage as an absolute. But if they're going to only flee/escape/sidestep AOEs, even if the damage is negligible, that's not right at all. I'm arguing that the absolute idea of it's dumb to stand there, so I will ALWAYS move, but only for this specific skill, is also not right at all. Last edited by Aeon_Xin; Nov 13, 2005 at 05:03 AM // 05:03.. |
||||
|
|
|
 |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jump, Climb, Swim - This Game is Missing Basic Fundamental Human Movements | alestian | Sardelac Sanitarium | 199 | May 04, 2007 08:50 AM // 08:50 |
| whispering | Sardelac Sanitarium | 0 | Oct 18, 2005 07:44 PM // 19:44 | |
| Crazy Idea - Balancing | Como Fort | Sardelac Sanitarium | 32 | Oct 10, 2005 07:30 PM // 19:30 |
| Request for more Aggressive Balancing | Zrave | The Riverside Inn | 261 | Aug 02, 2005 05:51 PM // 17:51 |
| Z-Shinrei | Sardelac Sanitarium | 12 | May 18, 2005 02:43 PM // 14:43 | |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 PM // 18:26.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("